Posts Tagged Healthcare

Cash For Clunkers Thank You For Proving Our Point

For years, conservatives and liberals have clashed over taxes.  Do we tax less, and allow the free market to thrive with the increased spending, or do we tax more to allow for an increase in government spending.

Cash For Clunkers has proven the conservative point of taxing less to benefit the economy, and here’s how.

Everyone, especially liberals are pointing out that one of the successes of Cash For Clunkers is that if you give people money, they will spend it.  But why did the government have to place restrictions on how it could be spent?  Had they simply not collected that $3 billion from the American taxpayer, we would have spent it as we saw fit to begin with.

Not only would people inevitably have purchased new (or even used cars), they also would have had additional money to pay for things like, gee I don’t know, maybe health care? 

This leads me to another point.  Cash For Clunkers was supposed to last until November.  Whether it was the apparent “success” of the program, or the flaws in the paperwork processing that caused the program’s early departure, it was still cut short.  What happens when the proposed universal health care ends up becoming too “successful” for its own good, or the inevitable mountains of paperwork become too much to handle?  Are people going to be left waiting weeks or months for the treatment they desperately need (similar to the auto dealers waiting on payments they also desperately need)?

It’s time to see the light at the end of the government sponsored tunnel.  More government involvement than is absolutely necessary in anything is never a good thing.  And right now there is definitely far more than is necessary.

Bookmark and Share
Blog Traffic Exchange Related Posts From Conservative Posts Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites Not Affiliated With Conservative Posts

, , , ,

No Comments

What’s Coming From Dr. Obama MD

The President, and democrats in Congress have been pushing hard lately for a health care bill to be passed.  The proposed bill will place tough restrictions on current health insurers, as well as set up a government run insurance for any uninsured American.

So what do Americans have to look forward to?  Based on other government programs and trends from other countries with socialized health care, here are a few of the things Americans will likely see in the future:

Quotas:Like any other government operation, there will be a budget in place.  That essentially means that the government will place limits on itself as far as how much they will be able to spend each year.  The President mentioned in his public address last week that doctors often times will choose the more expensive treatment, when a less expensive one will suffice.  In this situation, a less expensive treatment might be mandated when a more expensive one is necessary.  Additionally, the socialized programs in the UK and other countries are plagued with other similar annual quotas.

Longer Waits: The US Government recently launched the “Cash for Clunkers” program where it will pay $4,500 for your used car if you purchase a new, more fuel efficient car in return.  The program was scheduled to start last Friday, but was delayed until today due to a problem with the website used by dealerships to report the transactions.  While this doesn’t seem like a major catastrophe, the slightest wait for someone who is having a heart attack would be a disastrous catastrophe. 

Poor Coverage: Medicare, Medicaid and veterans’ hospitals are all shining examples of poorly run health care in the US.  The US government already has a proven track record of poor coverage through these programs, so why does anyone think that the new system will be any different? 

Redundancy: The President said that there are millions of uninsured Americans who will benefit from government run health care.  He implied that these millions of Americans are unable to get access to insurance because they simply can’t afford it.  If this was true, they would automatically be covered under Medicaid.  He failed to mention that there also happen to be millions of young, healthy Americans, who choose to spend their money on other things than health insurance.

The list could continue, but I think I’ve made my point.  The government has yet to prove that it is capable of running anything without having bureaucrats putting their two cents in where it isn’t wanted (or needed).  Health care is something that should be left to the public to handle, not bureaucrats.

Bookmark and Share
Blog Traffic Exchange Related Posts From Conservative Posts Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites Not Affiliated With Conservative Posts

, ,

2 Comments

Universal Insurance

Let’s get one thing straight here.  When people start talking about “universal health care” they’re really talking about how one goes about paying for health care.  The reality is that they’re not talking about health care at all.  They’re talking about insurance versus out of pocket expenses.

I was on my honeymoon last year in Europe and was talking to some nice people from England.  The discussion about the differences in our two countries health care came up when talking about the upcoming Presidential election.  The man I was talking to was defending the universal system in England by saying that if you don’t have insurance in the US, an ambulance won’t even take you to the hospital, and if you do manage to get to the hospital they won’t even look at you until you prove you can pay for the medical care.

He couldn’t be further from the truth.  In the US, as in England, no one is denied medical care in an emergency.  The only difference is who foots the bill.  In the US, if you have insurance, your insurance company pays, if not, you do.  In England, the tax payers fund all the health care.

Oh yea, one other major difference is the bureaucrats that the British have to deal with in order to get medical care.  We’re used to bureaucratic nonsense in the US when dealing with the government (long lines at the DMV, waiting periods for licenses and permits, etc.), but we don’t have life threatening injuries when dealing with the bureaucracy.

I never realized it until I spoke with this guy, but it seems like the British are fearful that without a universal health care system, they might not be able to get health care at all.  The thought that individuals can pay for their own health care doesn’t seem to cross their mind.  As a matter of fact, when I explained the insurance process in the US to this guy, he sort of had an “ah-ha” moment, almost like he never considered how easy it could be to simply pay for it yourself.

So what’s the point here?  The liberals keep touting universal health care as the way to go in the US.  No one stops to think that we already have universal health care.  Anyone and everyone can walk into an emergency room and get treatment for their medical problems.  It seems like liberals in the US are learning from the lessons learned from other countries like England.  They are instilling a sense of fear into Americans that don’t have insurance, making them think that it will be impossible to gain access to health care without universal coverage.

For whatever reason these people don’t have health insurance, either if they can’t afford it or don’t want to pay for it, they still have access to health care if they need it.

Bookmark and Share
Blog Traffic Exchange Related Posts From Conservative Posts Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites Not Affiliated With Conservative Posts

,

1 Comment

Are We Headed for a Welfare State?

With the proposed programs in the Obama administration’s budget, it appears as if we’re on a collision course with becoming a socialist state.  European countries have been on this path for decades, with universal health care and other similar programs.

The question one has to ask is, has any of these programs worked?  And in order to answer that question, you have to define what the expected result is.  If the result is to have everyone pay for everyone else’s health care, for example, then the program is a failure.  If it is to give everyone access to health care, then again the program is a failure.

In the UK, taxpayers fund the government sponsored health care system where everyone has “access” to health care.  I say “access”, because, yes everyone is “entitled” to health care for “free”, it just depends on how long you have to wait for it. 

It is perfectly reasonable for one to assume that if you have a potentially fatal disease, you should be moved to the front of the line, and you receive top priority.  However in the UK, they work on a quota system of sorts.  What this means is the government budgets for a certain number of open heart surgeries, brain surgeries, and other like treatments each year.  Once the quota is met for the year, anyone waiting for treatment has to wait until the next year.  Even if they are at risk of dying before being treated.

So is this what we want?  In an on-demand society that complains about a 3 hour wait in the emergency room, do we want to wait months to be treated for serious illnesses?

Hospitals are businesses like any other, except they also accept insurance as a form of payment.  If you don’t have insurance, they’ll put you on a payment plan.  While this may be financially difficult to those without insurance, it shouldn’t force everyone else to have to pay higher taxes.

Bookmark and Share
Blog Traffic Exchange Related Posts From Conservative Posts Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites Not Affiliated With Conservative Posts

, , ,

No Comments

Getting Vet’s Benefits Straight

President Obama had fished around with the idea of eliminating veteran’s benefits for vet’s wounded while serving their country.  Luckily no fish were biting on this idea.

Veterans serve, knowing that should anything happen to them they’ll be taken care of, and rightfully so.  I don’t care how much of a deficit this country is in, the country’s number one priority is it’s military.  Without it, we have nothing.  Those cushy Wall Street jobs won’t be so cushy if at any moment the nation could come under attack with no one around to protect us. 

Taking away veteran’s benefits equates to giving someone one more reason not to join the military in the first place. 

Thankfully, the Obama administration made the right decision and left the vet’s benefits in place…for now.

Bookmark and Share
Blog Traffic Exchange Related Posts From Conservative Posts Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites Not Affiliated With Conservative Posts

,

No Comments